What are we supposed to be?
Monday, July 25, 2011
p. 110
If you want to know why even in telling of trouble and sorrow I am giving thanks, this is why.
-Wendell Berry, Hannah Coulter
Wednesday, July 20, 2011
p.20
-Stan Godlovitch, 1999, Creativity in Nature
Tuesday, March 8, 2011
p.288
Between 1500 and 1700 an incredible transformation took place. A "natural" point of view about the world in which bodies did not move unless activated, either by an inherent organic mover or a "contrary to nature" superimposed "force", was replaced by a non-natural non-experiential "law" that bodies move uniformly unless hindered. The "natural" perception of geocentric earth in a finite cosmos was superseded by the "non-natural" commonsense "fact" of a heliocentric infinite universe. A subsistence economy in which resources, goods, money, or labor were exchanged for commodities was replaced in many areas by the open-ended accumulation of profits in an international market. Living animate nature died, while dead inanimate money would assume the organic attributes of growth, strength, activity, pregnancy, weakness, decay, and collapse obscuring and mystifying the new underlying social relations of production and reproduction that make economic growth and progress possible. Nature, women, blacks and wage laborers were set on a path toward a new status as "natural" and human resources for the modern world system. Perhaps the ultimate irony in these transformations was the new name given them: rationality.
~Merchant, The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology and the Scientific Revolution, 1980
Thursday, January 13, 2011
p. 15-16
~Narby, Intelligence in Nature: An Inquiry into Knowledge
Sunday, January 9, 2011
p. 43
~Mintz, Huck's Raft: A History of American Childhood
Thursday, January 6, 2011
p. 50
~Griffin, Eros of Everyday Life